← Back to the archive

Medical statistics 1850s

Florence Nightingale’s campaign in numbers

Florence Nightingale’s work after the Crimean War extended far beyond the ward. She gathered mortality figures and pressed for changes in military health administration. This diagram compares successive years in the British Army in the East, distinguishing deaths attributed to disease, wounds and other causes. Its large blue areas made preventable illness difficult to overlook. The terminology belongs to nineteenth-century medicine, and the figures summarise populations rather than individual experiences. Alongside her written reports, such graphics helped turn the conditions of military service into a subject of public argument and reform.

Two polar-area charts compare monthly deaths from disease, wounds and other causes in the Army in the East.View the full image ↗
Diagram of the Causes of Mortality in the Army in the East; late-1850s printed plate.Florence Nightingale; reproduced in the Harriet Martineau publication context · Data April 1854–March 1856; diagram issued in the late 1850s

A closer look: Two circles of mortality

Each month occupies a wedge, with the coloured areas measured outward from the centre. The blue disease category dominates much of the display. Nightingale used this striking form to make the scale of sickness legible to readers who might otherwise remember the war chiefly through battlefield injuries.

Street map around Broad Street, Soho, with stacked black death marks beside addresses and several pumps.View the full image ↗
Map associated with John Snow’s account of the 1854 Soho cholera outbreak.John Snow; Charles Cheffins, lithographer · 1854 outbreak; reproduced in Snow’s 1855 book

A closer look: A separate street-level survey

Snow’s street map concerns civilians in London during the 1854 cholera outbreak. Its bars locate deaths beside addresses, unlike Nightingale’s monthly Army totals. Together, these objects show two different ways nineteenth-century investigators used visual records to reason about health: one organised by place, the other by time and cause.

The history behind it

What the source establishes

The diagram invites two easy errors: reading its circles in ordinary left-to-right order and treating its coloured regions as stacked slices. Both are resolved by the printed headings and key. The earlier year is on the right, and the areas of the different causes are independently measured from the centre. The striking blue areas communicate the importance of disease in recorded mortality. That conclusion is stronger than any claim that the plate alone identifies precisely which reform caused the subsequent reduction. Historical diagnostic categories and the distinction between aggregate comparison and controlled causal evidence matter here.

Dates, places and close alternatives

The headings span April 1854 through March 1856, irrespective of the later publication context. The named population is the Army in the East; the plate is not confined to one ward or all civilian residents. The diagram associates large mortality with its disease category, while causal attribution to one reform needs more evidence.

Read the key before comparing the picture

Direction of reading is not a safe substitute for numbered headings. Likewise, a colour boundary can overlap another boundary without creating an extra independent quantity to add. The original explanation of measurement is part of the evidence. A later reader should preserve the historical disease category and compare the years it actually names, while separating that aggregate pattern from a more demanding claim about one reform’s isolated causal effect.

A different population

The additional street survey is a genuine record, but it does not count the British Army in the East. Its deaths and pumps cannot be added to the army’s monthly mortality totals or used to isolate the effect of one army reform. Similar subject matter and nearby dates do not make two documents observations of the same population. That is why identifying an irrelevant source is part of the investigation.

If this caught your interest

A few things to read next

Books for a longer visit, and a few good places to start online. These are ordinary links, with no affiliate commission.

On the bookshelf

  1. Florence Nightingale: The Woman and Her Legend

    Mark Bostridge

    A biography that follows Nightingale’s reform work as well as her nursing.

  2. A History of Data Visualization and Graphic Communication

    Michael Friendly and Howard Wainer

    Historical context for Nightingale’s graphic choices and the development of statistical displays.

  3. The Visual Display of Quantitative Information

    Edward R. Tufte

    For a closer look at how area, colour and comparison communicate quantities.

Read online

Where the pictures come from

The original records and their individual rights statements are below. The pictures have not been generated or altered for the game.

Diagram of the Causes of Mortality in the Army in the East; late-1850s printed plate.

David Rumsey Map Collection, 10563.002 / Internet Archive, via Wikimedia Commons · Data April 1854–March 1856; diagram issued in the late 1850s

Public domain historical diagram; item record marks the reproduction public domain.

Original archive record · Rights statement

Map associated with John Snow’s account of the 1854 Soho cholera outbreak.

John Snow / Charles Cheffins; digital reproduction via Wikimedia Commons and UCLA · 1854 outbreak; reproduced in Snow’s 1855 book

Public domain; the item record identifies the historical map and its reproduction as public domain.

Original archive record · Rights statement

History notes and reading lists prepared for Data Barnacle with AI assistance. The source institutions and authors are not sponsors or endorsers. Suggest a correction or another source

Examine the evidence

100%

Unchanged full archival image. Drag to pan or pinch to zoom.

The research desk